Current Issue Artciles
Corporate Wellness
Marcia Reid: Bullying: What are the Myths Surrounding Bullying and Harassment in the Workplace?
Rose Gantner Ed.D.: Running a Wellness and Health Management Program? Where’s Your Certification?
Ria Duykers: Corporate Wellness & Executive Health Programs: What are the Benefits of Providing These Services?
Kathleen M. Gorman, MPH and Ross M. Miller, MD, MPH: Relative Influence of Modifiable Health Risks on Employer-Related Outcomes
Corporate Wellness Magazin: In this issue, we wanted to highlight one of our 2011 Corporate Wellness Leadership awardees for their innovative wellness initiatives.
Jennifer Turgiss : Healthy Workplaces: Leading Organizations Get Ready for June’s National Employee Wellness Month
Column
Kevin L. Shrake, FACHE: Healthcare Reform: Using Rebates to Turn Bills into Cash
Manish Nachnani: Social Media Health Revolution
Michael A. Schroeder: Group Captives: An Appealing Alternative
Sibyl C. Bogardus, JD: Bronze to Platinum Health Plans: What Will It Mean?
Dr. Gene Lindsey: ACOs: Healthcare’s Best Hope
Self Funding
Brian Black: Health and Wellness: Five Apps That Will Help You Lose Weight
Dennis Toohey: Controlling Benefit Cost and Spending By Creating Your Own Marketplace
Thomas E. Dreisinger, PhD, FACSM: Chronic Low Back and Neck Pain: An Epidemic Out of Control
Ronald J. Ozminkowski, Ph.D., and Seth Serxner, Ph.D./MPH: Program Reporting: Using the Right Process to Tell the Story
Voluntary Benefits
CJ Scarlet and Shirlita McFarland: Situational Coaching Offers Lasting Impact
Doug Ross: Long-Term Care Insurance: Helping Others by Helping Yourself
Dr. David Stoneback : Voluntary Benefits as an Employee Protection Strategy
By: Jonathan Spero, M.D.: Transforming a Traditional Occupational Health Center into a Total Employee Health Cost Containment Center
Editorial
Jonathan Edelheit, Editor in Chief: “Raising the Bar”
Employer Sponsored Cancer Screening
With healthcare reform mandating coverage for many preventative services employers are taking a closer look at worksite health screenings. Health screenings not only assist in accessing the health risk of population or individual employee, but also pick up undiagnosed diseases that can be very costly if untreated.
Employer sponsored metabolic screenings are growing in popularity and identify undiagnosed conditions such as high blood pressure, elevated cholesterol, and diabetes. So what about cancer screenings? Cancer screening exams and tests can pick up life threatening cancers early in the disease increasing the likelihood of a cure.
Before employers implement cancer screening programs at the workplace, they need to understand what the research shows and be guided by evidence based medicine. Evidence based medicine aims to apply the best available evidence gained from scientific method to clinical decision-making. And when it comes to cancer screening, evidence medicine is even more important as the stakes are high and there exists much emotional bias.
So what is the evidence for or against cancer screenings? And what are the nationally recognized guidelines?
Over 11 million people in the United States have some form of cancer and there are more than 200 different types of cancer. The following are the 10 most commonly diagnosed cancer types in 2009 and the estimated number of new cancer patients diagnosed each year:
1. Non-melanoma skin cancer - 1 million plus (rarely deadly)
2. Lung cancer – 220,000
3. Breast Cancer – 200,000
4. Prostate Cancer – 195,000
5. Colorectal Cancer – 150,000
6. Bladder Cancer - 70,000
7. Melanoma - 69,000
8. Non-Hodgkin lymphoma - 66,000
9. Kidney cancer - 50,000
10. Leukemia – 45,000
Despite cancer’s enormous prevalence in our population, there exists only a handful of cancer screening tests and exams that have been proven to decrease the mortality related to a specific cancer. These screening tests must be done on a regular interval basis to be effective and include screenings for breast cancer, colorectal cancer, and cervical cancer.
Cancer Screenings Recommendations
Below are the current nationally recognized cancer screening recommendations. The timing and frequency of the testing can be modified based on family history and genetic testing.
Breast Cancer
- Yearly mammograms are recommended starting at age 40 and continuing for as long a woman is in good health
- Clinical breast exam (CBE) about every 3 years for women in their 20s and 30s and every year for women 40 and over
Colorectal Cancer
Colorectal cancer screening, in general, begins at age 50. Patients have a number of options as follows:
- Colonoscopy (every 10 years) OR
- Flexible sigmoidoscopy (every 5 years) OR
- CT scan (every 5 years)
PLUS yearly sampling of stool.
Cervical Cancer
- Regular female exam and pap smear as recommended by your physician
Prostate Cancer
The FDA has approved the use of the PSA test along with a digital rectal exam (DRE) to help detect prostate cancer in men 50 years of age or older; together, these tests can help doctors detect prostate cancer in men who have no symptoms of the disease. In fact, most doctors do recommend these tests for their male patients. However, as previously stated, the research has not yet proven that it will decrease the death rate related to this disease in a population.
Is there any test for ovarian cancer?
Some employers have started ordering the cancer antigen 125 (CA 125) blood test for their health screenings. This test is NOT recommended for women with an average risk of ovarian cancer. Why?
While women with ovarian cancer often have an elevated level of CA 125, an elevated CA 125 level doesn't always mean you have ovarian cancer. Some women with ovarian cancer never have an elevated CA 125 level. And there exist many other conditions (other than ovarian cancer) that can cause an elevated CA 125 level.
For these reasons, doctors don't recommend CA 125 testing in women with an average risk of ovarian cancer. Women with a high risk of ovarian cancer, such as those with mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes, which increase the risk of breast and ovarian cancers, may consider periodic CA 125 testing. But even in these high-risk situations, there's some disagreement about the usefulness of the CA 125 test.
Summary
Over the next decade several major advances in cancer screening hold enormous promise. However, at this time, effective cancer screening is limited to only a few cancers. Incorporating non-evidence based cancer screening tests into an employer sponsored health screening can actually do more harm than good. False positives can lead to unnecessary follow up procedures, costs, and employee concerns. Employers who are considering health screenings should keep this in mind and stick to nationally recognized cancer-screening guidelines.
About the Author
Jonathan Spero, MD, is CEO of InHouse Physicians and board certified in Internal Medicine. Dr. Spero is an expert in the field of targeted employee wellness programs with measureable ROIs. InHouse Physicians is a global employee health and wellness provider delivering innovative cost containment solutions to corporations around the world. InHouse Physicians high touch employee health services include a wide range of offerings such as cost effective worksite health centers, evidence based “pre-disease” wellness initiatives, health screenings plus analytics, flu vaccinations, and travel medicine. To learn more about InHouse Physicians visit their website at www.inhousephysicians.com or Dr. Spero can be reached at jspero@ihphysicians.com.




